Yearn vs. Anchor
Compare key details of Yearn and Anchor side by side in a structured table format. This overview highlights core features, differences, and relevant information for each option. Use it to review how various choices stack up across the category.
| Yearn | Anchor | |
|---|---|---|
| Supported Stablecoins | USDC, USDT, DAI, TUSD | UST (Terra), USDC, USDT |
| APY Range (%) | 2%–15% | 3%–20% |
| Fees | Performance fees (2%–20%) | None |
| Lock-Up Options | Flexible | Flexible |
| Security Measures | Audited smart contracts, insurance partnerships | Audited smart contracts |
| Interest Payout Frequency | Continuous (auto-compound) | Continuous (real-time) |
| Availability | Global (DeFi) | Global (DeFi) |
| Minimum Deposit | No minimum | No minimum |
| Maximum Coverage/Protection | Limited coverage through Nexus Mutual | No insurance (DeFi protocol) |
| Notable Features | Automated yield optimization strategies | Algorithmic stablecoin yields, Terra ecosystem |
Other Yearn Comparisons
Model ETF Portfolios vs. Crypto?
Compare 200+ portfolio recipes: Tactical (dynamic), Strategic (static), and Managed (ETF/Mutual Funds) at RecipeInvesting.com
Disclaimer: DigitalAssetHQ does not provide investment advice. All content is for informational purposes only. Investing in cryptocurrencies and digital assets involves risk. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.